Anyone who has ever tried to get a permit for a simple home renovation in cities like Dallas knows the frustration: months-long delays, endless red tape, and wasted time and money. A straightforward roof repair can turn into a nine-month bureaucratic process.
House Bill 23 (HB 23), scheduled for debate in the Texas House on Monday, seeks to address these permitting challenges by allowing licensed third-party professionals to conduct administrative reviews of permit applications.
Third parties would issue or deny permits based solely on a city’s existing ordinances and regulations.
Under the proposed legislation, cities would retain full control over zoning, platting, density, and land-use decisions. HB 23 does not alter a city’s authority to set development standards; it simply provides an option for permit applicants to use certified third parties to help process applications more efficiently.
Supporters argue that current permitting delays create significant hardships, particularly after events like hailstorms, when homeowners often struggle to obtain timely approvals for necessary repairs.
They contend that the bill would allow faster, more predictable service without changing city codes or development policies.
Third-party reviewers would be required to hold professional licenses or certifications, carry sufficient liability insurance, and base their determinations entirely on a municipality’s established rules.
Opposition to HB 23 stems largely from a misunderstanding. Some critics incorrectly conflate zoning authority (which cities keep) with the clerical act of issuing permits (which HB 23 improves).
It’s critical that lawmakers see the difference and recognize that HB 23 strengthens local control by keeping ordinances intact while ensuring ordinary Texans aren’t trapped in endless bureaucratic limbo.
HB 23 was reported favorably by the House Land and Resource Management Committee and is now awaiting consideration on the House floor. Texans can watch the live debate.
