fbpx

Opinion: Big Wins for Conservatives in North Texas School Districts

empty classroom
Empty classroom | Image by WFAA

The indoctrination and brainwashing happening in K-12 schools is out of control. I realized this as I finished college; my peers were intolerant of my conservative viewpoints and often reacted violently when I expressed my opinion. These college students didn’t become far-left activists simply because they got to college; it was the result of years of indoctrination piling up. To fight against this, I started an organization called Protect Texas Kids. We aim to fight against the Left’s war on kids, inside and outside of schools.

Part of our movement is to take back school boards and fix the education system, and we are proving to be successful.  The Left is feeling extremely threatened, and they’re doing everything they can to stop us.  They’ve called in legacy left-wing media companies to report on fake news to discredit conservative parents and school board members. Groups like the ACLU are also inserting themselves into school board issues across DFW, helping to demonize regular parents who just want to protect their kids from harmful material in schools. Some leftist parent groups are even posting callouts to leftists in other parts of the state and encouraging them to travel to school board meetings to speak out against conservatives. Despite these efforts from the Left, conservatives are still winning more school board races than ever and continuing to get strong policies passed in districts throughout the state.  This past Monday, we had two huge wins in North Texas alone.

On Monday, the conservative board members of GCISD voted to pass common-sense policies that focus on protecting Texas kids from the far-left, toxic ideologies and materials that are being found in schools across the state. Many great things were included in the policies, but some of the highlights include:

  • Students must use the correct restrooms and go by the correct pronouns.
  • Gender fluidity cannot be promoted or pushed.
  • CRT is completely banned; current state law only bans it from being taught in social studies, but this is an outright ban.
  • Obscene material is banned.
  • Parents will be involved in the library material approval process.
  • And more– read the entire policy here.

Although these seem like normal things that we shouldn’t need policy for, the Left was opposed and extremely upset. 195 people signed up to give public comment, and over 100 of these were raging leftists. These grown adults angrily screamed at the board about the “blood of dead kids” being on their hands, and dozens blamed the board for “future deaths and suicides” of “LGBT-identifying kids.” Some “parents” also used their children as props and forced them to give public comment against the proposed policy, which we see often from these sick people at board meetings. These belligerent “parents” also wore giant rainbow stickers on their clothing and faces, making it clear which side they were on.

Conservatives also showed up to give supportive comments to the board regarding the policy. Roughly half of those who signed up to give comment were in favor of the policy, and this drastically uplifted the mood inside of the board room. Around midnight, after about five hours of public comment, the board voted 4-3 to pass the conservative policies.

While the big school board meeting in GCISD was going on, Keller ISD was having an important meeting of their own. The board was voting on a new, thorough library content guideline policy that would eliminate explicit books and rate all other books based on their content to determine what grade level they should be accessible to. Another common sense policy that no one would be opposed to, right? No – liberals are hell-bent on providing kids with explicit and inappropriate materials – so they swarmed this meeting to give unintelligent public comment in opposition. Despite the angry mob of hateful liberals, the board voted to pass this new book review policy – another huge win for conservative parents and anyone else with common sense.

Now that our movement has started, it’s not going to stop; and that’s what the Left is most afraid of. Angry leftists have been repeatedly sharing our success stories to social media with captions like “lookout, this is coming to our district next.” And they’re right – we will continue our movement until every district has flipped conservative and is focused on protecting Texas kids.

Support our non-profit journalism

1 Comment

  1. irwin arnstein

    I have read the entire document carefully. The educational policy is as you have stated reflects the conservative nature of district policy. The problem is that bullying and social ostracizing are now ‘endorsed’ by that policy and it is hard to discuss differences. I agree with much of the policy. Where I have problems in your opinion piece is the name calling of ‘the left’ or ‘leftist policies’. Is anyone truly ‘the devil’ on either side?

    The ‘blood on their hands’ discourse is based on when bullying leads to violence or suicide. Teen suicide is a significant problem and if we are concerned about outside sources such as active shooters in Uvalde then we must consider the issues that will result in the death or injury to children in any form.

    https://www.healthyplace.com/suicide/gay-teen-suicide-risk-factors-statistics-where-to-get-help

    I would hope we would all remember John 15:12 when looking for any issues concerning anyone who is different when the argument is made that this country is based on Christianity. I consider that passage one the most important as we move through life. It is a goal I and I hope everyone tries to achieve.

    Likewise if it is appropriate to present an issue and change policy, freedom of speech and the document reference should encourage dialog.

    That is what a patriot and an American who believes in 1st amendment rights will defend. The comments presented do not promote hate speech and I have never heard of the different kids bullying and causing the injury or death to the majority of the school population.

    As conservative groups such as Protect Texas Kids have their voice then other groups as the ACLU has their voice too. We can then each decide and make each consideration known.

    I did not find on the Protect Texas Kids website the importance of not causing harm to any other child through bullying. I hope that can be added and stressed.

    Texas educational policy stresses that the topics you cover are not allowed to be discussed. I do not see any cause for alarm for someone to bring up these topics at a school meeting. There is almost 0 chance that any of this policy will ever be changed.

    Just as you are passionate about your position, others will be passionate about theirs. I hope that these topics can be reviewed and discussed without personal rancor because someone like yourself has an honest and good intent to protect our youth. So I have problems not with your beliefs or desires for the best, but I have problems in your presentation vilifying those who also want the best for their children who are different.

    Those who have lost children who come across your strongly worded website will fear for their children’s safety. Children who come across the wording of your presentation here and on your website are more likely to to bully or ostracize another child with tragic results.

    I hope there is a way to modify your presentation to leave out anything that would support dividing us further. I hope you can add to your page the importance of your position and stress not isolating and bullying of children who are already in trouble just trying to figure out who they are. And that issue spreads out in many directions.

    During my attendance at the University of Texas there were always suicides just from young adults who felt they couldn’t fit in, or could not meet parent’s expectations and had the love and support of their family withdrawn.

    I always remember my youth when interracial marriage was extremely controversial and led to tragic results. That issue has mostly been resolved with acceptance. I don’t believe the topic was discussed in school as I don’t remember it ever coming up.

    Can we leave room for each of us to have a voice and leave off terminology that will only serve to change the discussion towards anger? Once we are angry then it is hard to look at what someone says and their intent.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Continue reading on the app
Expand article