fbpx

Lawsuit | CVS Allegedly Violates Civil Rights

National

CVS Pharmacy | Image by Jonathan Weiss/Shutterstock

A nurse practitioner is suing CVS in federal court for allegedly firing her for refusing to prescribe hormonal contraception because it violated her religious beliefs.

Robyn Strader claims in her lawsuit that CVS terminated her employment after she requested a religious exemption from providing medication that could, in her view, “intentionally end the development or life of an unborn child,” according to a press release.

“After accommodating Robyn for six and a half years without a single complaint, CVS fired her because it simply did not like her pro-life religious beliefs,” said Christine Pratt, counsel for First Liberty Institute.

“It is illegal to issue a blanket revocation of all religious accommodations when it is so easy for CVS to accommodate its employees. CVS is sending a message that religious health care workers are not welcome and need not apply,” Pratt said.

The lawsuit was filed jointly by the First Liberty Institute and law firm Boyden Gray & Associates.

Strader had worked at the CVS Minute Clinic in Keller since 2015. While working at the location, she referred customers to other practitioners or nearby pharmacy locations when asked to provide medications that violated her religious beliefs.

However, in August 2021, CVS announced it would no longer provide religious exemptions to “essential” employees who objected to hormonal contraception. Strader was terminated in October 2021, shortly afterward.

In a statement to NBC News, a CVS spokesperson said that “educating and treating patients regarding sexual health matters — including pregnancy prevention” had become “essential” following an expansion of the company’s in-person clinic services.

Strader’s lawsuit alleges that CVS could have transferred her to another position in the company, which would have allowed for her religious exemption to be accommodated, but instead, the company opted to fire her.

“At a time when we need as many quality health care providers as possible, we should not be driving out excellent nurse practitioners like Robyn from the medical field because of her faith,” said Stephanie Taub, senior counsel at First Liberty Institute, speaking with The Dallas Express.

“This is particularly true when corporations like CVS can easily provide accommodations, as they did for Robyn for six and a half years.”

Strader further claims that CVS violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

“An employer cannot sidestep Title VII’s requirement to accommodate religious employees by merely labeling a particular function ‘essential.’ This label is particularly unconvincing when it concerns less than 0.2% of the functions an employee performs,” reads the suit.

Strader’s lawsuit is not the only one CVS is currently facing over this issue.

Two other suits have been brought to federal court by former nurse practitioners who claim they were also fired for refusing to carry out job duties that violated their religious beliefs.

Jonathan Berry, a partner at Boyden Gray & Associates who previously worked at the U.S. Department of Labor, explained that religious freedom is an essential pillar of employment law in the United States.

“No one should have to choose between her faith and her job, especially where it would be easy to continue a long-standing religious accommodation,” Berry said. “Boyden Gray & Associates looks forward to vigorously defending Robyn’s rights in court.”

If you enjoyed this article, please support us today!

Formed in 2021, we provide fact-based, non-partisan news. The Dallas Express is a non-profit organization funded by charitable support and advertising.

Please join us on the important journey to make Dallas a better place!

We welcome and appreciate comments on The Dallas Express as part of a healthy dialogue. We do ask that you be kind. Kind to each other and to everyone else in your comments. For more information, please refer to our Complete Comment Moderation Policy.

Subscribe to Comments
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bill
Bill
17 days ago

This should be interesting.

Jeff davis
Jeff davis
17 days ago

Next they will refuse to sell condoms, because they end expected life.

J S
J S
17 days ago

Her job was to be a healthcare provider not to decide what medicine people do and don’t deserve. She knew this while in school. She knew this when she graduated. She knew this when she applied for any nursing job.

She has no right to decide who gets what care or because of her religious beliefs. That’s bs. And people like her should be put to death immediately

Lyndsay
Lyndsay
Reply to  J S
17 days ago

You’re wrong! She does so have rights! And the attorney is chomping at the bit to prove CVS took the wrong approach! What’s even worse is that CVS accommodated her for 6 years, why change now? Because of the dang political pressure I’m sure they received! Good one CVS…way to cave!
Put to death? What a moronic statement! Rolling on floor!

CITIZEN
CITIZEN
17 days ago

Was she not hired at will? If no contract with specifics , she can be terminated without any reason being or needed to be provided.

Ranger71
Ranger71
Reply to  CITIZEN
16 days ago

In keeping with your line of argument an employee should be able to be terminated at the whim of the employer–not in keeping with current practice in the USA. So if employment protections are available based on race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, etc., why not religion? I’m okay with either, but let’s at least be consistent!