A study on deaths purportedly related to COVID-19 vaccines was published by a prestigious medical research journal, however, the publication did a 180 and pulled the article from its website.
The mainstream legacy media and major medical groups have heaped plenty of abuse on those who have expressed skepticism over the novel technology used to develop mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Now it seems as if every month the public is finding out more and more potential side effects, with the latest study (jettisoned by The Lancet) suggesting outright death is a possibility.
In March, one study suggested that the jab can cause seizures in some toddlers, as previously reported by The Dallas Express.
Relatedly, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 states that vaccine providers will not be liable for any injuries:
“Provides that no vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death: (1) resulting from unavoidable side effects; or (2) solely due to the manufacturer’s failure to provide direct warnings. Provides that a manufacturer may be held liable where: (1) such manufacturer engaged in the fraudulent or intentional withholding of information; or (2) such manufacturer failed to exercise due care. Permits punitive damages in such civil actions under certain circumstances.”
Anyway, here’s a bit of what the Gateway Pundit has to report on the study suggesting you could die if you get the vaccine:
“The study, titled ‘A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination,’ analyzed 325 autopsy cases and found that a staggering 73.9% of deaths were either directly due to or significantly contributed to by the COVID-19 vaccination.
“The paper’s lead author, Dr. Nicolas Hulscher, faced significant opposition in bringing these findings to light. After initially being downloaded over 100,000 times, The Lancet removed the paper within 24 hours, according to Dr. William Makis.
“According to The Daily Sceptic, the reason given at the time was, ‘This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.'”
To read more about the study, please click HERE.