The dozens of anti-Israel agitators who were arrested at the University of Texas at Austin two months ago for refusing to disperse will not face any consequences for their actions on that day thanks to a left-wing Travis County official who dismissed the charges.
It is currently unclear whether the move will embolden disruptive campus protests and anti-Israel demonstrations as the Jewish state’s war against the terrorist organization Hamas in Gaza continues.
Here’s some of what Cameron Abrams reported on for The Texan:
Travis County Attorney Delia Garza announced this week that 79 cases involving criminal trespass that occurred during pro-Palestine protests on the University of Texas (UT) at Austin campus would be dismissed.
Garza explained that her office spent 90 hours evaluating the cases and determined that they “cannot meet our legal burden to prove these 79 criminal trespass cases beyond a reasonable doubt.”
The cases in question concern individuals who were charged during the April 29 protest on the UT campus.
“I may not always agree with law enforcement tactics; they are important partners who we work with dually to ensure the safety of this community,” Garza added.
“Just as they make discretionary decisions every day on whether to make an arrest or not, we make discretionary decisions every day on whether to proceed with prosecution.”
Garza added, “This is how the system is supposed to work.”
“Our decision today is based on the circumstances and evidence and our determination that we cannot meet our legal burden, and that should in no way diminish the work they do on the street and the sacrifices they and their families make for all of us.”
In response to a question from the press, Garza said, “I wish our state leadership and even the university leadership had… I think there could have been another solution to allow these students to voice what they felt like they needed to voice.”
Following the announcement of the cases being dismissed, UT Austin released a statement expressing they are “deeply disappointed by the County Attorney’s actions.”
To read more about this purported judicial miscarriage, please click HERE.
